StockData

Ooma vs Sangoma Technologies

OOMA and SANG side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How OOMA and SANG compare

Ooma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.2% versus −15.5% for Sangoma Technologies).

Ooma scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Sangoma Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricOOMASANG
Size and price
Market cap$505M–
Share price$18.30$4.70
Change, 1 year55.0%−5.2%
Change, 5 years−8.5%−76.0%
Beta (5Y)0.771.38
Employees1,420–
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score33
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E48.2×–
P/S1.6×–
P/B5.1×–
EV/EBITDA31.0×–
P/FCF16.7×–
FCF yield6.0%–
Fair value$10.69–
Margin of safety−71.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)17.2% (better)−15.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average10.1% (better)8.8%
Profitability
Gross margin61.5%70.3% (better)
Operating margin3.6%–
Net margin3.6%–
FCF margin9.9%11.0% (better)
Return on equity11.7%–
Return on invested capital14.5%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.01 (better)0.16
Net debt / EBITDA−1.03–
Current ratio0.95 (better)0.78
Altman Z-score3.07–
Piotroski F-score7–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield1.9%–
Shareholder yield1.9%–
Ownership
Held by institutions72.3%23.4%
Held by insiders12.3%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$5.7M–
Short interest, % of float7.4%0.77%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.