Onterris vs RMR
ONT and RMR side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ONT and RMR compare
Onterris is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as RMR ($811M against $504M).
RMR grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.2% versus −9.1% for Onterris).
RMR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with −1.4% at Onterris.
RMR pays a dividend yielding 11.5%; Onterris does not pay one.
Onterris scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for RMR), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ONT | RMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $811M | $504M |
| Share price | $23.08 | $15.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.6% | 0.96% |
| Change, 5 years | −69.7% | −56.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 3,500 | 50K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.8× |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.6× | 10.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.6% | – |
| Fair value | $38.65 | $16.66 |
| Margin of safety | 40.3% (better) | 5.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.1% | −8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.4% (better) | 1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −39.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −40.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −22.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 6.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.4% | 1.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.3% | – |
| Return on equity | −2.3% | 4.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.1% | 20.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.72 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.04 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.88 (better) | 1.69 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.50 | 3.16 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 11.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 287% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.29% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 11.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 43.9% |
| Held by insiders | 9.6% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.2M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.0% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- ONT stock overview
- ONT income statement
- ONT valuation and score
- RMR stock overview
- RMR income statement
- RMR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.