StockData

On vs Under Armour

ONON and UAA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ONON and UAA compare

On grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.0% versus −3.6% for Under Armour).

On keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.8% compared with −10.0% at Under Armour.

On scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Under Armour), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricONONUAA
Size and price
Market cap–$2.1B
Share price$33.78$4.99
Change, 1 year−14.0%8.0%
Change, 5 years−13.8%−80.1%
Beta (5Y)1.771.29
Employees2,00014K
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)2
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.4×
P/B–1.5×
FCF yield–−3.8%
Fair value–$5.67
Margin of safety–12.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)30.0% (better)−3.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average47.9% (better)−1.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−15.9% (better)−585%
EPS growth (TTM)–−623%
Profitability
Gross margin62.8% (better)46.8%
Operating margin12.5% (better)−2.4%
Net margin6.8% (better)−10.0%
FCF margin9.5% (better)−1.6%
Return on equity–−29.8%
Return on invested capital–−5.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.41
Interest coverage12.7× (better)−1.9×
Current ratio2.83 (better)1.81
Altman Z-score–1.97
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions70.6%92.2%
Held by insiders37.3%39.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months$9.6M$225M (better)
Superinvestors holding2 (better)1

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.