StockData

Onfolio vs Parabolic Technologies

ONFO and PARA side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ONFO and PARA compare

Parabolic Technologies is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Onfolio ($369K against $117K).

Parabolic Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.6% versus −22.6% for Onfolio).

Onfolio keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −102% compared with −229% at Parabolic Technologies.

Parabolic Technologies pays a dividend yielding 962%; Onfolio does not pay one.

Parabolic Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Onfolio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricONFOPARA
Size and price
Market cap$117K$369K
Share price$0.774$0.104
Change, 1 year−98.6%−100.0%
Change, 5 years–−100%
Beta (5Y)2.29−1.04
Employees2733
StockData Score
Total score714 (better)
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score11
Health score44
Dividend score03 (better)
Valuation
P/S0.0× (better)0.0×
P/B–0.0×
Fair value–$11.92
Margin of safety–99.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.6%19.6% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin54.5%81.2% (better)
Operating margin−40.1% (better)−178%
Net margin−102% (better)−229%
Return on equity–−319%
Return on invested capital–−242%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio0.090.10 (better)
Altman Z-score−6.97 (better)−7.37
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–962%
Shareholder yield0.00%962% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions–98.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$49.6K (better)−$602K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.