StockData

Onfolio vs Obook

ONFO and OWLS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ONFO and OWLS compare

Obook grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.9% versus −22.6% for Onfolio).

Onfolio keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −102% compared with −405% at Obook.

Onfolio scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 0 for Obook), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricONFOOWLS
Size and price
Market cap$117K–
Share price$0.774$2.18
Change, 1 year−98.6%−75.3%
Beta (5Y)2.290.09
Employees27200
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)0
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score4 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.6%3.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin54.5% (better)2.6%
Operating margin−40.1% (better)−410%
Net margin−102% (better)−405%
FCF margin–−154%
Financial health
Interest coverage–−123.6×
Current ratio0.090.74 (better)
Altman Z-score−6.97–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.30%
Held by insiders–77.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$49.6K$175K (better)
Short interest, % of float–0.54%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.