StockData

Onconetix vs Yarrow Bioscience

ONCO and YARW side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ONCO and YARW compare

Yarrow Bioscience is the larger company, worth 16 times as much as Onconetix ($207M against $12.7M).

Yarrow Bioscience grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.8% versus −51.3% for Onconetix).

Onconetix keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1579% compared with −4646% at Yarrow Bioscience.

Yarrow Bioscience pays a dividend yielding 112%; Onconetix does not pay one.

Yarrow Bioscience scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Onconetix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricONCOYARW
Size and price
Market cap$12.7M$207M
Share price$3.21$18.03
Change, 1 year−99.8%2.4%
Change, 5 years−100.0%−98.1%
Beta (5Y)4.731.55
Employees1210
StockData Score
Total score313 (better)
Valuation score11
Growth score11
Performance score02 (better)
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score03 (better)
Valuation
P/S19.6× (better)363×
P/B0.9×0.8× (better)
FCF yield–−16.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−51.3%13.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−51.4%
Profitability
Gross margin80.4%–
Operating margin−2525% (better)−5219%
Net margin−1579% (better)−4646%
FCF margin–−5811%
Return on equity−105%−16.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−196%–
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−52.4×–
Current ratio2.2142.08 (better)
Altman Z-score−12.1919.42 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–112%
Shareholder yield0.00%112% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions1.7%2.7%
Held by insiders40.3%19.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months$8.4K–
Short interest, % of float40.6%1.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.