Odyssey Marine Exploration vs Rubico
OMEX and RUBI side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OMEX and RUBI compare
Rubico grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.8% versus −50.3% for Odyssey Marine Exploration).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OMEX | RUBI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.5M | – |
| Share price | $10.02 | $0.866 |
| Change, 1 year | −81.2% | −99.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −93.8% | – |
| Employees | 12 | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 101× | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −50.3% | −2.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −29.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −89.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −9983% | 52.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −13366% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.70 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.06 |
| Interest coverage | −12.7× | 1.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.05 | 1.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −49.98 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$131K |
Go deeper
- OMEX stock overview
- OMEX income statement
- OMEX valuation and score
- RUBI stock overview
- RUBI income statement
- RUBI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.