StockData

Omada Health vs P3 Health Partners

OMDA and PIII side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How OMDA and PIII compare

Omada Health is the larger company, worth 49 times as much as P3 Health Partners ($933M against $19.0M).

Omada Health grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.3% versus 7.5% for P3 Health Partners).

Omada Health keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.2% compared with −3.3% at P3 Health Partners.

Omada Health scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 4 for P3 Health Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricOMDAPIII
Size and price
Market cap$933M$19.0M
Share price$15.24$2.61
Change, 1 year−26.2%−65.2%
Change, 5 years–−99.5%
Beta (5Y)2.381.17
Employees916320
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)4
Valuation score11
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score6 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S2.8×0.0× (better)
P/B3.4×–
EV/EBITDA52.7×36.7× (better)
P/FCF33.1×–
FCF yield3.0%–
Fair value$9.26–
Margin of safety−64.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)43.3% (better)7.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–24.3%
Profitability
Gross margin70.7%–
Operating margin2.1% (better)−5.2%
Net margin4.2% (better)−3.3%
FCF margin8.5%–
Return on equity5.7%–
Return on invested capital28.2% (better)−32.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–28.58
Interest coverage22.4×–
Current ratio4.18 (better)0.53
Altman Z-score7.47 (better)0.29
Piotroski F-score7 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions85.9%65.0%
Held by insiders5.4%98.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$14.6M−$824K (better)
Short interest, % of float15.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.