Omnicell vs Pitney Bowes
OMCL and PBI side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OMCL and PBI compare
Pitney Bowes is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Omnicell ($2.1B against $1.6B).
On earnings, Pitney Bowes is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 36.1× for Omnicell.
Omnicell grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus −3.5% for Pitney Bowes).
Pitney Bowes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.1% compared with 3.6% at Omnicell.
Pitney Bowes pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Omnicell does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OMCL | PBI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $35.03 | $15.59 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.0% | 66.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.9% | 109% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.34 |
| Employees | 3,580 | 6,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 13 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.1× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.3× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.0× | 4.2× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.21 |
| FCF yield | 9.1% | 23.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $54.87 | $22.84 |
| Margin of safety | 36.2% (better) | 31.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% (better) | −3.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% (better) | −11.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 124% | 135% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 126% | 187% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −44.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | – |
| Net margin | 3.6% | 10.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.7% | 27.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.66 (better) | 0.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.48 (better) | 2.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 15.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 17.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 89.9% |
| Held by insiders | 3.3% | 5.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M (better) | −$92.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.6% | 14.9% |
Go deeper
- OMCL stock overview
- OMCL income statement
- OMCL valuation and score
- PBI stock overview
- PBI income statement
- PBI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.