Omnicell vs PAR Technology
OMCL and PAR side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OMCL and PAR compare
Omnicell is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as PAR Technology ($1.6B against $930M).
PAR Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.8% versus 5.6% for Omnicell).
Omnicell keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −12.2% at PAR Technology.
Omnicell scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for PAR Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OMCL | PAR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $930M |
| Share price | $35.03 | $22.48 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.0% | −42.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.9% | −64.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.57 |
| Employees | 3,580 | 1,809 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.1× | – |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/B | 1.2× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1× (better) | 7147× |
| P/FCF | 11.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.1% (better) | −0.23% |
| Fair value | $54.87 | $51.27 |
| Margin of safety | 36.2% | 56.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% | 16.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | 16.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 124% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 126% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −44.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.1% (better) | 42.9% |
| Operating margin | 5.2% (better) | −9.8% |
| Net margin | 3.6% (better) | −12.2% |
| FCF margin | 11.7% (better) | −0.41% |
| Return on equity | 3.5% (better) | −7.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.2% (better) | −3.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.52 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1863.40 |
| Interest coverage | – | −4.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.66 | 2.07 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.48 (better) | 0.92 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 116% |
| Held by insiders | 3.3% | 17.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M | $35.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.6% | 25.6% |
Go deeper
- OMCL stock overview
- OMCL income statement
- OMCL valuation and score
- PAR stock overview
- PAR income statement
- PAR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.