Omnicom vs Stagwell
OMC and STGW side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OMC and STGW compare
Omnicom is the larger company, worth 8.7 times as much as Stagwell ($22.3B against $2.6B).
Omnicom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.6% versus 7.7% for Stagwell).
Omnicom keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with 0.31% at Stagwell.
Omnicom pays a dividend yielding 3.9%; Stagwell does not pay one.
Omnicom scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Stagwell), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OMC | STGW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.3B | $2.6B |
| Share price | $81.26 | $10.47 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.0% | 120% |
| Change, 5 years | 18.1% | −1.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 1.29 |
| Employees | 120K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 262× |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.3× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.3× | 7.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 10.7% | 14.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $66.01 | $6.26 |
| Margin of safety | −23.1% (better) | −67.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 40.6% (better) | 7.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 26.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −71.7% | −50.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −33.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.2% | 36.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.0% (better) | 4.0% |
| Net margin | 1.7% (better) | 0.31% |
| FCF margin | 10.7% | 11.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.5% (better) | 1.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.04 (better) | 2.04 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.13 (better) | 4.19 |
| Interest coverage | 2.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.92 (better) | 0.81 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.13 | 1.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% | – |
| Payout ratio | 193% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 15.6% (better) | 4.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 19.5% (better) | 4.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 43.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.98% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$238K (better) | −$13.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.9% | – |
Go deeper
- OMC stock overview
- OMC income statement
- OMC valuation and score
- STGW stock overview
- STGW income statement
- STGW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.