Universal Display vs Silicon Motion Technology
OLED and SIMO side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OLED and SIMO compare
Silicon Motion Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.2% versus −1.9% for Universal Display).
Universal Display keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 36.7% compared with 13.8% at Silicon Motion Technology.
Universal Display pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Silicon Motion Technology does not pay one.
Universal Display scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 12 for Silicon Motion Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OLED | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | – |
| Share price | $90.54 | $183.65 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.3% | 94.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −41.2% | 163% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 469 | 2,009 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.4× | – |
| P/S | 6.5× | – |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.6× | – |
| PEG | 3.74 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.7% | – |
| Fair value | $146.04 | – |
| Margin of safety | 38.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.9% | 10.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.7% | 10.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.0% | 37.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.3% | 37.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | 9.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.9% (better) | 48.3% |
| Operating margin | 34.6% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net margin | 36.7% (better) | 13.8% |
| FCF margin | 36.9% (better) | 0.71% |
| Return on equity | 13.5% | 15.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 15.0% (better) | 14.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 7.56 (better) | 2.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 13.59 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 39.3% | 54.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 24.6% (better) | 7.4% |
| Buyback yield | 5.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.4% | 18.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 0.84% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.0M (better) | −$1.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.9% | – |
Go deeper
- OLED stock overview
- OLED income statement
- OLED valuation and score
- SIMO stock overview
- SIMO income statement
- SIMO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.