Oil States International vs Cactus
OIS and WHD side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OIS and WHD compare
Cactus is the larger company, worth 9.7 times as much as Oil States International ($5.0B against $513M).
Cactus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.4% versus −0.74% for Oil States International).
Cactus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with −16.5% at Oil States International.
Cactus pays a dividend yielding 0.92%; Oil States International does not pay one.
Cactus scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 5 for Oil States International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OIS | WHD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $513M | $5.0B |
| Share price | $8.57 | $62.28 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.6% | 46.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 71.4% | 64.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 2,172 | 1,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.1× |
| P/FCF | 15.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.6% | – |
| Fair value | $7.66 | $47.57 |
| Margin of safety | −11.8% (better) | −30.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.74% | 40.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.95% | 25.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −565% | 6.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −592% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.2% | 33.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −14.0% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −16.5% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −16.8% | 14.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −11.0% | 26.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.36 | 3.06 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.27 | 5.46 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.4% |
| Buyback yield | 1.9% (better) | 0.16% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% (better) | 1.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.8% | 95.7% |
| Held by insiders | 8.2% | 14.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$593K (better) | −$90.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- OIS stock overview
- OIS income statement
- OIS valuation and score
- WHD stock overview
- WHD income statement
- WHD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.