Oceaneering International vs SLB
OII and SLB side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OII and SLB compare
SLB is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as Oceaneering International ($79.8B against $4.1B).
Oceaneering International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.8% versus 2.5% for SLB).
SLB pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Oceaneering International does not pay one.
Oceaneering International scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for SLB), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OII | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $79.8B |
| Share price | $40.86 | $53.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 73.7% | 45.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 191% | 60.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 11K | 109K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 26.0× |
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 3.5× | 3.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.7× (better) | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | 18.2× | 16.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.5% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $28.72 | $39.80 |
| Margin of safety | −42.3% | −35.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.8% (better) | 2.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.8% (better) | 8.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −24.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −29.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 10.4% | – |
| Net margin | – | 8.5% |
| FCF margin | 7.8% | 13.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 13.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 24.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 (better) | 0.43 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.36 | 0.98 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 8.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.18 (better) | 1.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.48 (better) | 2.95 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 54.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.74% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.74% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 0.19% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.0M (better) | −$25.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- OII stock overview
- OII income statement
- OII valuation and score
- SLB stock overview
- SLB income statement
- SLB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.