Orion vs WD 40
OEC and WDFC side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OEC and WDFC compare
WD 40 is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Orion ($3.0B against $226M).
WD 40 grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus 0.86% for Orion).
WD 40 keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with −1.8% at Orion.
Both pay dividends: Orion yields 1.6% and WD 40 1.8%.
WD 40 scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Orion), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OEC | WDFC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $226M | $3.0B |
| Share price | $3.99 | $223.40 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.5% | 11.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.2% | −3.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 1,650 | 522 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 36.7× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 4.3× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 11.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.4× (better) | 25.2× |
| P/FCF | 5.2× (better) | 30.7× |
| PEG | – | 4.61 |
| FCF yield | 19.3% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $25.42 | $186.85 |
| Margin of safety | 84.3% (better) | −19.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.86% | 11.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.7% (better) | 7.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −9.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −9.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 3.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.5% | 55.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.0% | 15.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.8% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 14.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −8.1% | 30.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.7% | 28.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.48 | 0.32 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.30 | 0.13 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 39.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 2.57 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.44 | 12.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 1.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 65.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −16.7% | 7.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.35% | 0.99% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.1% | 87.8% |
| Held by insiders | 4.1% | 0.98% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$12.3K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- OEC stock overview
- OEC income statement
- OEC valuation and score
- WDFC stock overview
- WDFC income statement
- WDFC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.