StockData

Ocular Therapeutix vs Spero Therapeutics

OCUL and SPRO side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How OCUL and SPRO compare

Ocular Therapeutix is the larger company, worth 25 times as much as Spero Therapeutics ($1.5B against $59.4M).

Spero Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.3% versus −9.7% for Ocular Therapeutix).

Spero Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.7% compared with −649% at Ocular Therapeutix.

Spero Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Ocular Therapeutix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricOCULSPRO
Size and price
Market cap$1.5B$59.4M
Share price$6.66$1.02
Change, 1 year−38.5%−59.2%
Change, 5 years−0.45%−93.8%
Beta (5Y)1.261.13
Employees32525
StockData Score
Total score311 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score00
Performance score03 (better)
Health score35 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–25.5×
P/S29.0×1.3× (better)
P/B3.3×1.3× (better)
EV/EBITDA–1.4×
FCF yield−18.3%–
Fair value$4.81$1.72
Margin of safety−38.5%40.7% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−9.7%−3.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average24.4%48.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin87.3%–
Operating margin−681%12.8% (better)
Net margin−649%15.7% (better)
FCF margin−530%–
Return on equity−93.5%19.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.17 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−30.6×–
Current ratio9.12 (better)6.12
Altman Z-score1.28 (better)−6.00
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions94.4%36.9%
Held by insiders2.9%24.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.5M−$499K (better)
Short interest, % of float13.6%1.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.