Optical Cable vs Omega Flex
OCC and OFLX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OCC and OFLX compare
Omega Flex is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Optical Cable ($237M against $92.6M).
On earnings, Omega Flex is cheaper: it trades at 22.3× trailing earnings, against 36.1× for Optical Cable.
Optical Cable grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.9% versus −2.0% for Omega Flex).
Omega Flex keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.7% compared with 3.1% at Optical Cable.
Omega Flex pays a dividend yielding 5.8%; Optical Cable does not pay one.
Omega Flex scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Optical Cable), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OCC | OFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $92.6M | $237M |
| Share price | $10.47 | $23.44 |
| Change, 1 year | 33.0% | −15.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 154% | −82.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 348 | 172 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.1× | 22.3× (better) |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 6.3× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.7× | 14.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 210× | 33.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.48% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $4.02 | $28.50 |
| Margin of safety | −161% | 17.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.9% (better) | −2.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% (better) | −1.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −34.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −34.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −5.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.3% | 55.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.2% | 12.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.1% | 10.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.53% | 7.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.6% (better) | 12.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.6% | 24.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 3.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.17 | 5.36 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.27 | 10.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 130% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.2% | 30.7% |
| Held by insiders | 21.7% | 48.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.4M | $193K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- OCC stock overview
- OCC income statement
- OCC valuation and score
- OFLX stock overview
- OFLX income statement
- OFLX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.