New York Times vs WEBTOON Entertainment
NYT and WBTN side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NYT and WBTN compare
New York Times is the larger company, worth 9.4 times as much as WEBTOON Entertainment ($11.3B against $1.2B).
New York Times grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.8% versus −0.49% for WEBTOON Entertainment).
New York Times keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.2% compared with −25.1% at WEBTOON Entertainment.
New York Times pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; WEBTOON Entertainment does not pay one.
New York Times scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 8 for WEBTOON Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NYT | WBTN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.3B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $70.17 | $8.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.1% | −50.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.54 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 6,000 | 1,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.4× | – |
| P/S | 3.8× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 5.5× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 18.2× | – |
| PEG | 1.12 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.5% (better) | −0.33% |
| Fair value | $54.44 | $12.56 |
| Margin of safety | −28.9% | 29.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.8% (better) | −0.49% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 22.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 23.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.4% (better) | 24.4% |
| Operating margin | 16.0% (better) | −3.8% |
| Net margin | 13.2% (better) | −25.1% |
| FCF margin | 20.9% (better) | −0.29% |
| Return on equity | 19.7% (better) | −25.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.9% (better) | −5.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | −601.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.58 | 2.63 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 10.17 (better) | 2.34 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 32.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 7 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 24.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.5% (better) | −2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | −2.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 41.0% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 83.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.8M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.6% | 18.6% |
Go deeper
- NYT stock overview
- NYT income statement
- NYT valuation and score
- WBTN stock overview
- WBTN income statement
- WBTN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.