New York Times vs Quad
NYT and QUAD side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NYT and QUAD compare
New York Times is the larger company, worth 30 times as much as Quad ($11.7B against $385M).
New York Times grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.8% versus −4.9% for Quad).
Both pay dividends: New York Times yields 1.2% and Quad 5.0%.
New York Times scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 10 for Quad), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NYT | QUAD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.7B | $385M |
| Share price | $72.70 | $7.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.2% | 34.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 55.6% | 83.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 6,000 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.2× | – |
| P/S | 3.8× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 5.7× | 3.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.2× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 19.8× | 10.3× (better) |
| PEG | 1.11 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.1% | 9.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $54.88 | $12.83 |
| Margin of safety | −32.5% | 41.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.8% (better) | −4.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% (better) | −3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 20.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 21.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.7% (better) | 21.4% |
| Operating margin | 16.2% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net margin | 13.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 19.5% (better) | 1.6% |
| Return on equity | 20.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 28.2% (better) | 13.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 3.67 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 0.97 |
| Altman Z-score | 10.19 (better) | 1.61 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | 5.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 32.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 24.6% (better) | 14.9% |
| Buyback yield | 1.9% | 2.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% | 7.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 41.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 39.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 6.9% |
Go deeper
- NYT stock overview
- NYT income statement
- NYT valuation and score
- QUAD stock overview
- QUAD income statement
- QUAD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.