NXP Semiconductors vs Whirlpool
NXPI and WHR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NXPI and WHR compare
NXP Semiconductors is the larger company, worth 34 times as much as Whirlpool ($65.5B against $2.0B).
On earnings, Whirlpool is cheaper: it trades at 10.3× trailing earnings, against 22.2× for NXP Semiconductors.
NXP Semiconductors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus −3.9% for Whirlpool).
NXP Semiconductors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 22.6% compared with 1.3% at Whirlpool.
Both pay dividends: NXP Semiconductors yields 1.6% and Whirlpool 6.0%.
NXP Semiconductors scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 13 for Whirlpool), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NXPI | WHR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $65.5B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $259.61 | $29.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 26.8% | −59.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 15.8% | −86.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 32K | 41K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.2× | 10.3× (better) |
| P/S | 5.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 5.7× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7× | 7.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% (better) | −8.8% |
| Fair value | $335.91 | $101.03 |
| Margin of safety | 22.7% | 70.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% (better) | −3.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.3% (better) | −4.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 38.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 39.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 113% (better) | −19.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.0% (better) | 13.6% |
| Operating margin | 32.0% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net margin | 22.6% (better) | 1.3% |
| FCF margin | 21.3% (better) | −1.2% |
| Return on equity | 28.4% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.3% (better) | 4.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.96 (better) | 1.80 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.55 (better) | 5.90 |
| Interest coverage | 8.9× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.04 (better) | 1.15 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.83 (better) | 1.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 6.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 34.4% | 93.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 22.0% (better) | 1.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.91% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 6.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.4% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.14% | 5.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.3M | $199K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.7% | 28.4% |
Go deeper
- NXPI stock overview
- NXPI income statement
- NXPI valuation and score
- WHR stock overview
- WHR income statement
- WHR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.