Quanex Building Products vs Gibraltar Industries
NX and ROCK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NX and ROCK compare
Quanex Building Products and Gibraltar Industries are about the same size, with market caps of $879M and $901M.
Gibraltar Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.9% versus 1.3% for Quanex Building Products).
Quanex Building Products keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with −3.1% at Gibraltar Industries.
Quanex Building Products pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Gibraltar Industries does not pay one.
Quanex Building Products scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Gibraltar Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NX | ROCK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $879M | $901M |
| Share price | $19.19 | $30.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.6% | −50.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.9% | −59.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 7,071 | 2,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 1.2× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/FCF | 9.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.3% (better) | −2.8% |
| Fair value | $21.55 | $42.34 |
| Margin of safety | 11.0% | 28.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% | 46.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.6% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −1286% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −2188% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.6% (better) | 24.2% |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 7.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.4% (better) | −3.1% |
| FCF margin | 4.9% (better) | −1.6% |
| Return on equity | 6.2% (better) | −5.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% (better) | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.89 (better) | 1.37 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.87 (better) | 6.62 |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.23 (better) | 1.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.89 (better) | 1.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | 32.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.55% (better) | 0.50% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.50% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 10.1% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.4M | $1.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- NX stock overview
- NX income statement
- NX valuation and score
- ROCK stock overview
- ROCK income statement
- ROCK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.