Nutanix vs Teradata
NTNX and TDC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NTNX and TDC compare
Teradata is the larger company, worth 162 times as much as Nutanix ($3.2B against $19.6M).
Nutanix grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.4% versus 0.96% for Teradata).
Nutanix keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 52.8% compared with 27.1% at Teradata.
Teradata scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Nutanix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NTNX | TDC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.6M | $3.2B |
| Share price | $67.21 | $34.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.4% | 62.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 88.5% | −29.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 8,350 | 5,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.2× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 0.0× (better) | 5.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | −6.8× | 12.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 0.0× (better) | 4.3× |
| PEG | – | 0.11 |
| FCF yield | 4281% (better) | 23.1% |
| Fair value | $27956.70 | $38.38 |
| Margin of safety | 99.8% (better) | 10.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.4% (better) | 0.96% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.4% (better) | −2.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 700% (better) | 316% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 320% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 3.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 86.8% (better) | 60.8% |
| Operating margin | 9.6% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net margin | 52.8% (better) | 27.1% |
| FCF margin | 29.5% | 43.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 37460% (better) | 119% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 43.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −1.86 |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.80 (better) | 0.91 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.04 | 1.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2462% (better) | 4.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 2462% (better) | 4.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.2% | 132% |
| Held by insiders | 6.6% | 20.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.1M | −$10.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 19.5% |
Go deeper
- NTNX stock overview
- NTNX income statement
- NTNX valuation and score
- TDC stock overview
- TDC income statement
- TDC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.