Northern Technologies International vs Omega Flex
NTIC and OFLX side by side, both in fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NTIC and OFLX compare
Omega Flex is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as Northern Technologies International ($237M against $72.4M).
Northern Technologies International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.7% versus −2.0% for Omega Flex).
Omega Flex keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.7% compared with −1.3% at Northern Technologies International.
Both pay dividends: Northern Technologies International yields 0.13% and Omega Flex 5.8%.
Omega Flex scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 4 for Northern Technologies International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NTIC | OFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $72.4M | $237M |
| Share price | $7.62 | $23.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.4% | −15.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −52.4% | −82.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.38 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 94 | 172 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.3× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.2× | 14.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 33.4× |
| FCF yield | −4.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $4.75 | $28.50 |
| Margin of safety | −60.4% | 17.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.7% (better) | −2.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.1% (better) | −1.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −139% | −34.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −140% | −34.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −5.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.8% | 55.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.0% | 12.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.3% | 10.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.5% | 7.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.6% | 12.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.3% | 24.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.72 | 5.36 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.30 | 10.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 5.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 130% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.2% (better) | 4.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.13% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.9% | 30.7% |
| Held by insiders | 19.5% | 48.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$225K | $193K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.15% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- NTIC stock overview
- NTIC income statement
- NTIC valuation and score
- OFLX stock overview
- OFLX income statement
- OFLX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.