StockData

InspireMD vs Picard Medical

NSPR and PMI side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NSPR and PMI compare

InspireMD is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Picard Medical ($29.9M against $16.9M).

InspireMD grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (53.4% versus 41.0% for Picard Medical).

Picard Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −444% compared with −484% at InspireMD.

InspireMD scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Picard Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNSPRPMI
Size and price
Market cap$29.9M$16.9M
Share price$0.644$7.23
Change, 1 year−64.0%−94.7%
Change, 5 years−82.7%–
Beta (5Y)0.46−2.21
Employees12775
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)7
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score00
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S2.8×2.7× (better)
P/B1.0× (better)9.9×
FCF yield−142%–
Fair value$1.41$4.72
Margin of safety54.4% (better)−53.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)53.4% (better)41.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average29.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin18.1%18.6% (better)
Operating margin−494%−248% (better)
Net margin−484%−444% (better)
FCF margin−392%–
Return on equity−203%–
Return on invested capital−4320%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio3.80 (better)1.02
Altman Z-score−11.98 (better)−17.32
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−81.2%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−81.2%
Ownership
Held by institutions53.6%6.5%
Held by insiders31.6%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$369K–
Short interest, % of float0.79%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.