NPK International vs Ooma
NPKI and OOMA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NPKI and OOMA compare
NPK International is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Ooma ($758M against $498M).
On earnings, NPK International is cheaper: it trades at 18.1× trailing earnings, against 47.5× for Ooma.
NPK International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.8% versus 17.2% for Ooma).
NPK International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.0% compared with 3.6% at Ooma.
NPK International scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Ooma), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NPKI | OOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $758M | $498M |
| Share price | $9.03 | $18.06 |
| Change, 1 year | −29.0% | 53.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 228% | −9.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 91 | 1,420 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.1× (better) | 47.5× |
| P/S | 2.5× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× (better) | 5.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2× (better) | 30.6× |
| P/FCF | 73.0× | 16.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.4% | 6.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.19 | $10.46 |
| Margin of safety | 19.3% (better) | −72.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.8% (better) | 17.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −10.9% | 10.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.6% | 61.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| Net margin | 14.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| FCF margin | 3.4% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.3% (better) | 11.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.6% | 14.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.26 (better) | −1.03 |
| Current ratio | 1.68 (better) | 0.95 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.48 (better) | 3.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.6% (better) | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% (better) | 1.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 72.3% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | 12.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.5M (better) | −$5.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.7% | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- NPKI stock overview
- NPKI income statement
- NPKI valuation and score
- OOMA stock overview
- OOMA income statement
- OOMA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.