National Presto Industries vs Turning Point Brands
NPK and TPB side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NPK and TPB compare
Turning Point Brands is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as National Presto Industries ($1.2B against $1.0B).
Turning Point Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.8% versus 20.9% for National Presto Industries).
National Presto Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.9% compared with 5.1% at Turning Point Brands.
Both pay dividends: National Presto Industries yields 0.70% and Turning Point Brands 0.54%.
National Presto Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Turning Point Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NPK | TPB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $143.39 | $58.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.6% | −42.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 65.9% | 57.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 1,200 | 484 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 42.3× |
| P/S | 1.9× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 2.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.2× (better) | 21.2× |
| P/FCF | 38.7× (better) | 49.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.61 |
| FCF yield | 2.6% (better) | 2.0% |
| Fair value | $107.41 | $34.31 |
| Margin of safety | −33.5% (better) | −71.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.9% | 23.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.4% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.0% (better) | −47.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −51.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.5% | 58.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.6% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| FCF margin | 4.9% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 10.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.73 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.3× |
| Current ratio | 5.22 | 5.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 10.36 (better) | 3.56 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.70% (better) | 0.54% |
| Payout ratio | 16.7% | 22.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.70% (better) | 0.54% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.4% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 28.1% | 6.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$418K (better) | −$4.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 17.8% |
Go deeper
- NPK stock overview
- NPK income statement
- NPK valuation and score
- TPB stock overview
- TPB income statement
- TPB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.