National Presto Industries vs Sturm Ruger
NPK and RGR side by side, both in fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NPK and RGR compare
National Presto Industries is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Sturm Ruger ($993M against $806M).
National Presto Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 10.6% for Sturm Ruger).
National Presto Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.0% compared with 2.7% at Sturm Ruger.
Both pay dividends: National Presto Industries yields 0.72% and Sturm Ruger 0.87%.
National Presto Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 11 for Sturm Ruger), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NPK | RGR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $993M | $806M |
| Share price | $139.11 | $50.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.1% | 60.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 61.0% | −31.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 1,200 | 18 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 50.0× |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× (better) | 18.0× |
| P/FCF | 21.3× (better) | 29.2× |
| FCF yield | 4.7% (better) | 3.4% |
| Fair value | $132.93 | $27.46 |
| Margin of safety | −4.7% (better) | −83.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.9% (better) | 10.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.4% (better) | −0.82% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 48.1% | 530% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 677% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.7% | 19.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.4% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net margin | 10.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| FCF margin | 8.1% (better) | 4.6% |
| Return on equity | 14.2% (better) | 5.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.0% (better) | 6.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 75.1× |
| Current ratio | 4.76 (better) | 3.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 9.29 (better) | 9.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.87% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 12.5% | 42.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −37.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.72% | 0.87% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 61.4% | 59.9% |
| Held by insiders | 28.1% | 27.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$418K | $211K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- NPK stock overview
- NPK income statement
- NPK valuation and score
- RGR stock overview
- RGR income statement
- RGR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.