StockData

NeuroPace vs Neuronetics

NPCE and STIM side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NPCE and STIM compare

NeuroPace is the larger company, worth 3.8 times as much as Neuronetics ($413M against $109M).

Neuronetics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.0% versus 23.0% for NeuroPace).

Neuronetics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −14.4% compared with −17.7% at NeuroPace.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNPCESTIM
Size and price
Market cap$413M$109M
Share price$12.02$1.43
Change, 1 year−10.9%−35.0%
Change, 5 years1.4%−64.3%
Beta (5Y)1.051.57
Employees209658
StockData Score
Total score55
Valuation score00
Growth score33
Performance score11
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.9×0.7× (better)
P/B35.9×5.8× (better)
FCF yield−3.0% (better)−8.8%
Fair value$6.78–
Margin of safety−77.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)23.0%23.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.4%24.8% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin77.8% (better)50.7%
Operating margin−9.5%−9.4% (better)
Net margin−17.7%−14.4% (better)
FCF margin−11.6%−6.0% (better)
Return on equity−126%−100% (better)
Return on invested capital−41.4%−19.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity5.153.30 (better)
Interest coverage−1.6× (better)−1.7×
Current ratio5.26 (better)2.01
Altman Z-score−3.79−3.36 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions77.4%48.8%
Held by insiders16.6%51.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$399K$4.6M (better)
Short interest, % of float3.0%18.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.