StockData

Neptune Insurance vs TWFG

NP and TWFG side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NP and TWFG compare

Neptune Insurance is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as TWFG ($3.9B against $1.5B).

On earnings, TWFG is cheaper: it trades at 46.6× trailing earnings, against 91.9× for Neptune Insurance.

TWFG grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.0% versus 33.8% for Neptune Insurance).

TWFG scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Neptune Insurance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNPTWFG
Size and price
Market cap$3.9B$1.5B
Share price$28.48$27.02
Change, 1 year6.8%7.4%
Change, 5 years−57.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.820.26
Employees62400
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E91.9×46.6× (better)
P/S20.0×4.7× (better)
P/B–30.8×
EV/EBITDA48.2×20.0× (better)
P/FCF–26.5×
FCF yield–3.8%
Fair value–$10.84
Margin of safety–−149%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)33.8%35.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)0.14%–
EPS growth (TTM)–34.9%
Profitability
Operating margin41.3% (better)17.3%
Net margin22.7%–
FCF margin–17.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.05
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.94
Interest coverage5.4×207× (better)
Current ratio0.912.81 (better)
Altman Z-score5.4714.93 (better)
Piotroski F-score6–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions48.5%16.9%
Held by insiders81.3%69.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$438M$3.4M (better)
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float8.3%6.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.