Nano-X Imaging vs QT Imaging

NNOX and QTI side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

nnoxNano-X Imaging$0.32−89.4% in 1 year

qtiQT Imaging$1.88−69.5% in 1 year

How NNOX and QTI compare

QT Imaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (157% versus 15.4% for Nano-X Imaging).

QT Imaging keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −54.6% compared with −576% at Nano-X Imaging.

Nano-X Imaging scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for QT Imaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

Metric	NNOX	QTI
Size and price
Market cap	–	$27.5M
Share price	$0.322	$1.88
Change, 1 year	−89.4%	−69.5%
Change, 5 years	−98.3%	−98.7%
Beta (5Y)	1.37	0.05
Employees	197	32
StockData Score
Total score	5 (better)	2
Valuation score	0	0
Growth score	2 (better)	1
Performance score	1 (better)	0
Health score	2 (better)	1
Dividend score	0	0
Valuation
P/S	–	0.9×
P/B	–	10.4×
FCF yield	–	−51.3%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)	15.4%	157% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin	−98.2%	40.2% (better)
Operating margin	−601%	−24.9% (better)
Net margin	−576%	−54.6% (better)
FCF margin	−346%	−47.7% (better)
Return on equity	−63.6%	–
Return on invested capital	−59.5%	–
Financial health
Debt / equity	0.04 (better)	1.47
Current ratio	2.84 (better)	2.78
Altman Z-score	–	−1.63
Piotroski F-score	3	4 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield	–	−94.3%
Shareholder yield	–	−94.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions	13.9%	22.3%
Held by insiders	10.4%	91.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months	$190K (better)	$155K
Short interest, % of float	9.3%	–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.