NN vs Twin Disc
NNBR and TWIN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NNBR and TWIN compare
Twin Disc is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as NN ($351M against $285M).
NN grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.9% versus 12.1% for Twin Disc).
Twin Disc keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.0% compared with −5.4% at NN.
Twin Disc pays a dividend yielding 0.71%; NN does not pay one.
Twin Disc scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 5 for NN), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NNBR | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $285M | $351M |
| Share price | $3.04 | $24.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 101% | 51.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.2% | 82.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.79 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 1,650 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.2× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 2.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.9× | 10.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.32 |
| FCF yield | −0.47% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.74 | $37.89 |
| Margin of safety | −74.9% | 36.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.9% (better) | 12.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.25% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1903% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 1855% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 14.3% | 26.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.1% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.4% | 8.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.28% | 6.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −34.2% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −5.2% | 4.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.63 | 0.18 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.04 | 0.38 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 7.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.75 | 2.46 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.53 | 3.40 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | – | 7.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.71% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 32.3% | 64.6% |
| Held by insiders | 25.0% | 8.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.9M | −$418K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.3% | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- NNBR stock overview
- NNBR income statement
- NNBR valuation and score
- TWIN stock overview
- TWIN income statement
- TWIN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.