NN vs SPX Technologies
NNBR and SPXC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NNBR and SPXC compare
SPX Technologies is the larger company, worth 25 times as much as NN ($8.0B against $325M).
SPX Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 5.1% for NN).
SPX Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with −6.2% at NN.
SPX Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 4 for NN), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NNBR | SPXC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $325M | $8.0B |
| Share price | $3.93 | $159.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 107% | −20.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −30.9% | 141% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.75 | 1.07 |
| Employees | 1,650 | 4,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 28.8× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/B | 15.3× | 3.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.5× | 15.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 42.2× | 26.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.4% | 3.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.74 | $194.47 |
| Margin of safety | −126% | 17.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% | 20.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.25% | 15.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 32.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 24.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.0% | 40.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.0% | 16.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.2% | 11.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.7% | 12.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −70.1% | 14.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −5.7% | 11.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 7.85 | 0.26 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.49 | 0.84 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 10.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 1.82 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.58 | 4.36 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.7% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 28.4% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.9M (better) | −$19.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- NNBR stock overview
- NNBR income statement
- NNBR valuation and score
- SPXC stock overview
- SPXC income statement
- SPXC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.