Net Lease Office Properties vs SITE Centers
NLOP and SITC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NLOP and SITC compare
Net Lease Office Properties is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as SITE Centers ($141M against $34.5M).
On earnings, SITE Centers is cheaper: it trades at 0.3× trailing earnings, against 7.8× for Net Lease Office Properties.
Net Lease Office Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−55.1% versus −61.8% for SITE Centers).
Both pay dividends: Net Lease Office Properties yields 202% and SITE Centers 304%.
Net Lease Office Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for SITE Centers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NLOP | SITC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $141M | $34.5M |
| Share price | $9.54 | $0.657 |
| Change, 1 year | −68.1% | −90.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −96.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.06 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 197 | 361 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 0.9× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.3× (better) | −1.1× |
| PEG | – | 0.06 |
| Fair value | $31.81 | $28.20 |
| Margin of safety | 70.0% | 97.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −55.1% (better) | −61.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −23.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 338% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 60.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 34.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 6.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 6.49 (better) | 1.06 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 202% | 304% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 46.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 202% | 304% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.2% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | 5.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$20.3K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 13.8% |
Go deeper
- NLOP stock overview
- NLOP income statement
- NLOP valuation and score
- SITC stock overview
- SITC income statement
- SITC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.