Nine Energy Service vs Expro
NINE and XPRO side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NINE and XPRO compare
Expro is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as Nine Energy Service ($1.5B against $104M).
Nine Energy Service grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.4% versus −7.1% for Expro).
Expro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.3% compared with −9.1% at Nine Energy Service.
Expro scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for Nine Energy Service), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NINE | XPRO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $104M | $1.5B |
| Share price | $7.42 | $13.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 1383% | −1.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −18.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 1.07 |
| Employees | 1,072 | 8,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 75.1× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 79.3× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.6× |
| FCF yield | −22.5% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $20.03 | $10.69 |
| Margin of safety | 63.0% (better) | −26.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% (better) | −7.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.6% | 18.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −70.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −71.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 22.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.42% | 3.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.1% | 1.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.1% | 7.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −342% | 1.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.85% | 2.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.78 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 35.21 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.33 (better) | 2.05 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.46 (better) | 1.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 4.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.8% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 42.6% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- NINE stock overview
- NINE income statement
- NINE valuation and score
- XPRO stock overview
- XPRO income statement
- XPRO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.