Nine Energy Service vs ProPetro
NINE and PUMP side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NINE and PUMP compare
ProPetro is the larger company, worth 8.4 times as much as Nine Energy Service ($881M against $104M).
Nine Energy Service grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.4% versus −6.0% for ProPetro).
ProPetro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.16% compared with −9.1% at Nine Energy Service.
ProPetro scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Nine Energy Service), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NINE | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $104M | $881M |
| Share price | $7.48 | $7.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 1396% | −32.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −7.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.91 |
| Employees | 1,072 | 1,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 79.7× | 5.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | −22.3% | −10.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.22 | $9.96 |
| Margin of safety | 61.1% (better) | 28.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% (better) | −6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.6% (better) | 10.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 23.9% |
| Operating margin | 0.42% | 0.48% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.1% | 0.16% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.1% (better) | −7.9% |
| Return on equity | −342% | 0.22% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.85% (better) | 0.30% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.78 (better) | 0.86 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 35.21 | 0.63 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.33 | 3.49 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.47 (better) | 1.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.8% | 120% |
| Held by insiders | 42.6% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$278M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 15.0% |
Go deeper
- NINE stock overview
- NINE income statement
- NINE valuation and score
- PUMP stock overview
- PUMP income statement
- PUMP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.