StockData

NICE vs Zeta Global

NICE and ZETA side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NICE and ZETA compare

Zeta Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.9% versus 7.7% for NICE).

NICE keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.8% compared with −0.14% at Zeta Global.

NICE scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Zeta Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNICEZETA
Size and price
Market cap–$15.6B
Share price$113.76$31.17
Change, 1 year−15.3%75.6%
Change, 5 years−58.9%239%
Beta (5Y)1.181.99
Employees4,0003,300
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)11
Valuation score00
Growth score33
Performance score5 (better)3
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–10.0×
P/B–16.9×
EV/EBITDA–144×
P/FCF–69.7×
FCF yield–1.4%
Fair value–$4.61
Margin of safety–−576%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7.7%35.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.3%28.8% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)39.3%–
EPS growth (TTM)43.0%–
EPS growth, 5Y average26.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin66.4% (better)59.5%
Operating margin21.9% (better)1.6%
Net margin20.8% (better)−0.14%
FCF margin23.7% (better)14.3%
Return on equity16.4% (better)−0.27%
Return on invested capital19.1% (better)3.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.21 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA−0.49−1.04
Interest coverage–16.1×
Current ratio1.552.38 (better)
Altman Z-score–17.77
Piotroski F-score7 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions58.1%37.4%
Held by insiders0.40%9.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$50.0K (better)−$400K
Short interest, % of float–3.1%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.