Cloudflare vs Zscaler
NET and ZS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NET and ZS compare
Cloudflare is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Zscaler ($100.0B against $38.8B).
Cloudflare grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.5% versus 25.4% for Zscaler).
Zscaler keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.9% compared with −8.2% at Cloudflare.
Zscaler scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Cloudflare), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NET | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $100.0B | $38.8B |
| Share price | $280.70 | $237.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.4% | −25.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 42.3% | −29.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.27 | 1.79 |
| Employees | 5,156 | 8,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 39.8× | 11.6× (better) |
| P/B | 61.7× | 14.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 2478× |
| P/FCF | 287× | 45.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.35% | 2.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $76.27 | – |
| Margin of safety | −268% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.5% (better) | 25.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 38.1% (better) | 37.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 72.6% | 76.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −14.1% | −4.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −8.2% | −1.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 13.9% | 25.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −14.4% | −2.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −19.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −30.9× | −11.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.82 (better) | 1.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 12.66 (better) | 4.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.9% | 50.9% |
| Held by insiders | 8.2% | 18.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$660M | −$16.7M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- NET stock overview
- NET income statement
- NET valuation and score
- ZS stock overview
- ZS income statement
- ZS valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs NET
- CRWD vs ZS
- DBX vs NET
- DDOG vs NET
- DT vs NET
- EPAM vs ZS
- GEN vs NET
- MDB vs NET
- NET vs OKTA
- NET vs RBLX
- NET vs TWLO
- NET vs YOU
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.