StockData

Nephros vs Utah Medical Products

NEPH and UTMD side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NEPH and UTMD compare

Utah Medical Products is the larger company, worth 7.0 times as much as Nephros ($233M against $33.3M).

On earnings, Nephros is cheaper: it trades at 17.1× trailing earnings, against 22.3× for Utah Medical Products.

Utah Medical Products pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Nephros does not pay one.

Nephros scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Utah Medical Products), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNEPHUTMD
Size and price
Market cap$33.3M$233M
Share price$3.07$73.03
Change, 1 year−28.4%27.5%
Change, 5 years−58.6%−36.8%
Beta (5Y)0.580.48
Employees36140
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)10
Valuation score4 (better)3
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score02 (better)
Valuation
P/E17.1× (better)22.3×
P/S1.5× (better)6.4×
P/B–1.9×
EV/EBITDA14.8×14.1× (better)
P/FCF–20.3×
FCF yield–4.9%
Fair value$4.25$76.45
Margin of safety27.7% (better)4.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)20.4%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.0% (better)−1.8%
Net income growth (TTM)29.0%–
EPS growth (TTM)38.5%–
EPS growth, 5Y average–3.4%
Profitability
Gross margin60.5% (better)57.9%
Operating margin8.5%28.4% (better)
Net margin8.9%–
FCF margin–31.7%
Return on invested capital–23.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Net debt / EBITDA–−8.51
Current ratio5.5048.62 (better)
Altman Z-score−3.0157.94 (better)
Piotroski F-score7–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–1.7%
Buyback yield–0.80%
Shareholder yield0.00%2.5% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions48.9%72.8%
Held by insiders9.2%7.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$66.8K
Short interest, % of float0.12%5.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.