StockData

Nocera vs Paranovus Entertainment Technology

NCRA and PAVS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NCRA and PAVS compare

Paranovus Entertainment Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20311% versus −39.0% for Nocera).

Nocera keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −71.4% compared with −87.2% at Paranovus Entertainment Technology.

Nocera scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for Paranovus Entertainment Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNCRAPAVS
Size and price
Market cap$3.3M–
Share price$1.38$2.52
Change, 1 year−96.1%−100.0%
Change, 5 years−99.5%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)0.710.54
Employees2034
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)3
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
P/B0.6×–
Fair value$3.97–
Margin of safety65.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−39.0%20311% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average56.6% (better)−27.2%
Profitability
Gross margin2.0%16.5% (better)
Operating margin–−100%
Net margin−71.4% (better)−87.2%
FCF margin–−9.6%
Return on equity−108%−45.9% (better)
Return on invested capital–−65.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−55.9×
Current ratio9.42 (better)8.18
Altman Z-score−2.72–
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−0.35%–
Shareholder yield−0.35%–
Ownership
Held by insiders94.0%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$14.8K–
Short interest, % of float46.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.