StockData

Jinxin Technology vs 17 Education & Technology

NAMI and YQ side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NAMI and YQ compare

Jinxin Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.6% versus −44.0% for 17 Education & Technology).

Jinxin Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −22.8% compared with −146% at 17 Education & Technology.

17 Education & Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Jinxin Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNAMIYQ
Size and price
Share price$1.71$2.70
Change, 1 year−91.1%−46.0%
Change, 5 years–−77.3%
Beta (5Y)−0.180.73
Employees10K1,017
StockData Score
Total score36 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score00
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1.6% (better)−44.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−39.4%
Net income growth (TTM)−565%–
EPS growth (TTM)−275%–
Profitability
Gross margin11.0%47.8% (better)
Operating margin−25.2% (better)−154%
Net margin−22.8% (better)−146%
FCF margin−6.1%28.7% (better)
Return on equity−95.5%−45.4% (better)
Return on invested capital−266%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.13 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−3257.9×–
Current ratio1.501.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score25 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%0.01%
Held by insiders59.2%24.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$145K$178K (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.