StockData

Nano Labs vs Sequans Communications

NA and SQNS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NA and SQNS compare

Sequans Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−28.5% versus −33.5% for Nano Labs).

Nano Labs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 502% compared with −415% at Sequans Communications.

Nano Labs scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Sequans Communications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNASQNS
Size and price
Share price$1.46$2.38
Change, 1 year−67.0%−63.6%
Change, 5 years–−98.3%
Beta (5Y)0.980.81
Employees6737
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score00
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−33.5%−28.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average66.2%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−290%
EPS growth (TTM)–−165%
Profitability
Gross margin−147%53.6% (better)
Operating margin264% (better)−425%
Net margin502% (better)−415%
FCF margin−401%–
Return on equity26.5%–
Return on invested capital10.7%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.51–
Net debt / EBITDA2.34–
Interest coverage4.2× (better)−2.4×
Current ratio1.20 (better)0.34
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.38%
Held by insiders42.4%16.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$85.1K$1.2M (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.