StockData

Nano Labs vs SuperCom

NA and SPCB side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NA and SPCB compare

SuperCom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.94% versus −33.5% for Nano Labs).

Nano Labs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 502% compared with 13.4% at SuperCom.

SuperCom scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Nano Labs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNASPCB
Size and price
Share price$1.38$8.62
Change, 1 year−69.6%−17.4%
Change, 5 years–−94.5%
Beta (5Y)0.971.13
Employees6755
StockData Score
Total score57 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score4 (better)3
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−33.5%0.94% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average66.2% (better)18.8%
Net income growth (TTM)–467%
EPS growth (TTM)–97.4%
Profitability
Gross margin−147%55.2% (better)
Operating margin264% (better)−1.2%
Net margin502% (better)13.4%
FCF margin−401%−22.8% (better)
Return on equity26.5% (better)8.8%
Return on invested capital10.7% (better)−0.61%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.510.40 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA2.34 (better)3.40
Interest coverage4.2×–
Current ratio1.205.75 (better)
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Ownership
Held by insiders42.4%0.43%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$85.1K–
Short interest, % of float–2.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.