Marzetti vs J M Smucker
MZTI and SJM side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MZTI and SJM compare
J M Smucker is the larger company, worth 4.6 times as much as Marzetti ($13.9B against $3.0B).
J M Smucker grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus 1.1% for Marzetti).
Marzetti keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.9% compared with 2.5% at J M Smucker.
Both pay dividends: Marzetti yields 3.6% and J M Smucker 3.4%.
Marzetti scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 10 for J M Smucker), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MZTI | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $13.9B |
| Share price | $109.74 | $129.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.3% | 28.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −31.7% | 3.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 3,500 | 3,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.7× | – |
| P/S | 1.6× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.2× (better) | 24.9× |
| P/FCF | 14.5× | 8.7× (better) |
| PEG | 0.79 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.9% | 11.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $168.84 | $85.56 |
| Margin of safety | 35.0% (better) | −51.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.1% | 5.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.7% | 38.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.4% (better) | 9.0% |
| Net margin | 9.9% (better) | 2.5% |
| FCF margin | 10.7% | 17.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.7% (better) | 3.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.3% (better) | 3.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.19 (better) | 1.17 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.56 (better) | 8.10 |
| Current ratio | 1.56 (better) | 0.87 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.54 (better) | 1.52 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | 56.8% | 204% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.0% (better) | 4.1% |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.05% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 3.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.9% | 87.7% |
| Held by insiders | 27.8% | 0.51% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$136K (better) | −$17.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- MZTI stock overview
- MZTI income statement
- MZTI valuation and score
- SJM stock overview
- SJM income statement
- SJM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.