Myers Industries vs Latham
MYE and SWIM side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MYE and SWIM compare
Myers Industries and Latham are about the same size, with market caps of $1.1B and $972M.
On earnings, Myers Industries is cheaper: it trades at 36.9× trailing earnings, against 103× for Latham.
Myers Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.8% versus 11.9% for Latham).
Myers Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.3% compared with 1.6% at Latham.
Myers Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Latham does not pay one.
Myers Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Latham), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MYE | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $972M |
| Share price | $28.07 | $8.26 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.9% | 21.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.0% | −63.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 1.89 |
| Employees | 2,200 | 1,804 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.9× (better) | 103× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 3.5× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.9× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/FCF | 13.0× (better) | 20.9× |
| FCF yield | 7.7% (better) | 4.8% |
| Fair value | $23.99 | $5.49 |
| Margin of safety | −17.0% (better) | −50.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.8% (better) | 11.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.8% (better) | −10.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.9% (better) | 33.8% |
| Operating margin | 10.7% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net margin | 3.3% (better) | 1.6% |
| FCF margin | 9.5% (better) | 7.8% |
| Return on equity | 9.7% (better) | 2.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.5% (better) | 5.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.96 | 0.69 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.19 (better) | 2.33 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.89 | 2.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.89 (better) | 2.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | – |
| Payout ratio | 71.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.07% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.2% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 10.3% | 17.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | $316K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- MYE stock overview
- MYE income statement
- MYE valuation and score
- SWIM stock overview
- SWIM income statement
- SWIM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.