Magnachip Semiconductor vs Power Integrations
MX and POWI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MX and POWI compare
Power Integrations is the larger company, worth 24 times as much as Magnachip Semiconductor ($2.6B against $108M).
Power Integrations grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.3% versus −7.4% for Magnachip Semiconductor).
Power Integrations keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.8% compared with −17.1% at Magnachip Semiconductor.
Power Integrations pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Magnachip Semiconductor does not pay one.
Power Integrations scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Magnachip Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MX | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $108M | $2.6B |
| Share price | $2.96 | $46.49 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.7% | 30.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −84.3% | −56.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 711 | 877 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 58.8× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 5.7× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 60.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 28.4× |
| FCF yield | −31.0% | 3.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $13.82 | $33.82 |
| Margin of safety | 78.6% (better) | −37.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.4% | 2.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −18.8% | −1.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 149% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 155% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −19.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 14.7% | 53.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −24.2% | 8.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −17.1% | 9.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −19.1% | 20.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −12.0% | 6.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −17.1% | 8.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.19 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.65 | 7.88 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.92 | 19.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 106% |
| Buyback yield | 0.22% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.22% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.8% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 18.0% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.2M (better) | −$30.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- MX stock overview
- MX income statement
- MX valuation and score
- POWI stock overview
- POWI income statement
- POWI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.