Multi Ways vs WF
MWG and WFF side by side, both in miscellaneous manufacturing industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MWG and WFF compare
WF grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (61.9% versus 44.1% for Multi Ways).
Multi Ways keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.97% compared with −64.4% at WF.
WF scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for Multi Ways), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MWG | WFF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.45 | $1.12 |
| Change, 1 year | −41.9% | −64.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | – |
| Employees | 6 | 142 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.1% | 61.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −4374% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −4133% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.8% | 31.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.7% (better) | −20.5% |
| Net margin | −0.97% (better) | −64.4% |
| FCF margin | 13.7% (better) | −36.7% |
| Return on equity | – | −83.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −26.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.02 |
| Interest coverage | 0.5× (better) | −90.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.57 | 4.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 37.9% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.05% | 1.0% |
Go deeper
- MWG stock overview
- MWG income statement
- MWG valuation and score
- WFF stock overview
- WFF income statement
- WFF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.