StockData

MicroVision vs Peraso

MVIS and PRSO side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MVIS and PRSO compare

MicroVision is the larger company, worth 6.7 times as much as Peraso ($37.1M against $5.5M).

MicroVision grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (90.9% versus −38.5% for Peraso).

Peraso keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −85.6% compared with −2231% at MicroVision.

Peraso scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for MicroVision), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMVISPRSO
Size and price
Market cap$37.1M$5.5M
Share price$1.09$0.366
Change, 1 year−93.2%−63.8%
Change, 5 years−99.1%−99.8%
Beta (5Y)1.651.26
Employees35042
StockData Score
Total score610 (better)
Valuation score33
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score11
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S7.4×0.7× (better)
P/B1.6×1.1× (better)
FCF yield−180%−125% (better)
Fair value$2.22$1.09
Margin of safety51.0%66.5% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)90.9% (better)−38.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−17.1%6.0% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin−276%56.6% (better)
Operating margin−2195%−85.8% (better)
Net margin−2231%−85.6% (better)
FCF margin−1326%−82.0% (better)
Return on equity−198%−181% (better)
Return on invested capital–−402%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−10.9×–
Current ratio0.803.17 (better)
Altman Z-score−19.66 (better)−38.29
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−57.8%–
Shareholder yield−57.8%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions10.5%3.6%
Held by insiders10.2%29.3%
Short interest, % of float20.5%13.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.