MicroVision vs Neonode
MVIS and NEON side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MVIS and NEON compare
MicroVision is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Neonode ($35.8M against $9.7M).
MicroVision grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (90.9% versus −2.3% for Neonode).
Neonode keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −336% compared with −2231% at MicroVision.
Neonode scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for MicroVision), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MVIS | NEON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $35.8M | $9.7M |
| Share price | $1.05 | $0.580 |
| Change, 1 year | −92.6% | −74.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.1% | −94.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.65 | 2.06 |
| Employees | 350 | 39 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 7.1× | 4.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | −187% | −116% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.20 | $2.40 |
| Margin of safety | 52.2% | 75.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 90.9% (better) | −2.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −17.1% (better) | −19.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −180% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −276% | 99.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2195% | −376% (better) |
| Net margin | −2231% | −336% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1326% | −525% (better) |
| Return on equity | −198% | −31.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −84.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −10.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.80 | 13.06 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −19.67 | −11.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −60.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −60.0% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.5% | 11.6% |
| Held by insiders | 10.2% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.5% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- MVIS stock overview
- MVIS income statement
- MVIS valuation and score
- NEON stock overview
- NEON income statement
- NEON valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.