StockData

McEwen vs Silvercorp Metals

MUX and SVM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MUX and SVM compare

Silvercorp Metals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.6% versus 45.1% for McEwen).

McEwen scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Silvercorp Metals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMUXSVM
Size and price
Market cap$730M–
Share price$11.90$8.66
Change, 1 year−32.7%22.7%
Change, 5 years8.2%102%
Beta (5Y)1.461.11
Employees486–
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)6
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score33
Performance score01 (better)
Health score22
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E20.5×–
P/S3.0×–
EV/EBITDA10.1×–
Fair value$12.82–
Margin of safety7.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)45.1%46.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average13.5%17.9% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−117%
EPS growth (TTM)–−118%
Profitability
Gross margin30.2%57.9% (better)
Operating margin20.6% (better)18.7%
Net margin–−2.3%
FCF margin–67.9%
Return on equity–−1.2%
Return on invested capital–9.6%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA0.85–
Interest coverage–6.1×
Current ratio1.343.58 (better)
Altman Z-score0.08–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions56.4%54.7%
Held by insiders–0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$41.0K–
Short interest, % of float–12.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.