MasTec vs MYR
MTZ and MYRG side by side, both in heavy construction other than building construction contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTZ and MYRG compare
MasTec is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as MYR ($14.9B against $4.4B).
On earnings, MYR is cheaper: it trades at 26.8× trailing earnings, against 30.4× for MasTec.
MasTec grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.7% versus 16.1% for MYR).
MYR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with 2.8% at MasTec.
MYR scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 13 for MasTec), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTZ | MYRG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.9B | $4.4B |
| Share price | $186.06 | $282.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.9% | 25.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 98.3% | 152% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 36K | 9,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.4× | 26.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 3.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.6× | 14.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 36.9× | 22.8× (better) |
| PEG | 0.23 (better) | 1.75 |
| FCF yield | 2.7% | 4.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $199.80 | $303.05 |
| Margin of safety | 6.9% (better) | 6.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.7% (better) | 16.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.7% (better) | 10.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 46.3% | 116% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 45.7% | 120% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.0% | 16.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.7% (better) | 12.5% |
| Operating margin | – | 5.6% |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 4.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.3% | 4.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.03 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.06 (better) | −0.44 |
| Interest coverage | – | 61.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.39 | 1.40 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.57 | 6.44 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.2% | 99.7% |
| Held by insiders | 21.7% | 4.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.3M (better) | −$11.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | 4.5% |
Go deeper
- MTZ stock overview
- MTZ income statement
- MTZ valuation and score
- MYRG stock overview
- MYRG income statement
- MYRG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.